NBC News misled us about American support for Roe

Earlier this week, NBC and The Wall Street Journal released survey results showing that for the first time a majority of Americans want abortion to be legal. The NBC News report characterized the results this way:

54 percent of adults say that abortion should be legal either always or most of the time, while a combined 44 percent said it should be illegal – either with or without exceptions… In addition, a whopping 70 percent of Americans oppose the Roe v. Wade decision being overturned, including 57 percent who feel strongly about this.

When I first read this, I viewed it with no little skepticism. It seemed to go against the widely-known recent trend, which shows Americans by and large becoming more pro-life than previous generations. I wish that some reporters might have been as skeptical before seizing upon the results to argue that “Republicans should stop talking about Roe v. Wade.” It’s true that the pro-life cause received some really bad PR in 2012, but American attitudes toward abortion are more complicated than their feelings about Richard Mourdock and Todd Akin.

As it turns out, American attitudes are more complicated than even NBC News’ own report indicates. NBC News highlights what it believes to be two key numbers: (1) that 70 percent want Roe v. Wade to remain the law of the land and (2) that a majority of Americans want abortion to be legal. Both of these two points are misleading. But you have to actually look into the survey itself to see why.

First, the survey question about Roe v. Wade was very deceptive. It reads this way:

The Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe versus Wade decision established a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy. Would you like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn its Roe versus Wade decision, or not? [underline mine]

This question leads people to believe that Roe v. Wade only establishes a right to abortion in the first trimester. That claim is transparently false. Roe v. Wade and its companion decision Doe v. Bolton effectively eliminate the relevance of trimesters. Roe and Doe establish a right to abortion at any time during pregnancy for any reason. If pollsters really want to find out what Americans think about Roe v. Wade, they should ask this: “Do you agree with Roe v. Wade that a woman should be able to have an abortion at any time during her pregnancy for any reason?” Polls show that a majority of Americans do not in fact agree with that interpretation of Roe. A majority of the respondents to this poll don’t even agree with that interpretation.

Second, the NBC/WSJ poll does not prove that a majority of Americans think abortion should be legal—at least not in the way that Roe v. Wade defines it. When asked if abortion should be legal, here’s how people actually responded:

Always legal…………..………………….31%
Legal most of the time………………23%
Illegal, with exceptions…………..…35%
Illegal, without any exceptions….9%

Do the math here. This means that 67 percent believes that there should be some sort of restriction on abortion. Only 31 percent support the “always legal” position, which is the position of Roe v. Wade. Can you see now how misleading NBC News’ report was on these results?

The truth of the matter is that Americans are ambivalent about abortion. Solid majorities oppose the unrestricted license to abortion that Roe provides. Nevertheless, Americans are not willing to outlaw it altogether. Partly because they like abortion rights, and partly becaue they don’t understand Roe.

Bottom line. This is no time for Republicans (or pro-life Democrats for that matter) to stop talking about Roe v. Wade. If anything, we need to be saying louder than ever that Roe v. Wade provides an unrestricted license to abortion that has presided over the legal killing of 55 million human beings since 1973. The pro-life side still has the moral highground in this debate, and we shouldn’t surrender it for any reason—much less for spurious reports like this one.

10 Responses to NBC News misled us about American support for Roe

  1. Don Johnson January 25, 2013 at 5:28 pm #

    The (mostly ultraliberal) news media distorts the truth??!!

  2. Keith Kraska January 25, 2013 at 5:38 pm #

    As a pro-lifer, I wouldn’t count “legal most of the time” on my side, regardless of what Roe says. I wouldn’t even consider multiple exceptions to be in agreement. Those who truly believe all unborn children are fully equal, and who act, talk and vote like it, are a small minority.

    • Andy Moffat January 25, 2013 at 8:29 pm #

      True, maybe they’re not on your side, but I think the point is that they may also not be as much on the other side as some, like NBC and The Wall Street Journal, would like us to think.

  3. Aaron O'Kelley January 25, 2013 at 7:10 pm #

    This reminds me of a joke I heard back when Bush (43) was president:

    One day President Bush and the Pope were out walking on the banks of the Potomac. Suddenly, a gust of wind came along and carried the Pope’s hat into the river. President Bush politely said, “Don’t worry, I’ll get it.” And then he walked out onto the water as if it were solid ground, retrieved the hat, and brought it back to the Pope.

    The next day the headline in the New York Times read, “Bush Can’t Swim”.

  4. Scott Tsao January 25, 2013 at 9:14 pm #

    It is interesting that even Bill Moyers bought into this deception in his introduction to an interview with a couple of abortion rights activists:

    http://billmoyers.com/segment/jessica-gonzalez-rojas-and-lynn-paltrow-on-abortion-rights-activism/

    I wonder if Mr. Moyers might consider interviewing women on the other side of the debate after realizing that he has been misled by the liberal news media.

    • James Stanton January 26, 2013 at 2:49 am #

      I don’t buy into the liberal media canard seeing that liberals treat the media with similar contempt and that corporations have interests that sharply differ from core liberal causes although there may be some overlap. I gather you are not aware of Moyers’ political leanings?

      I think the headline NBC used is misleading but I’m surprised the strict pro-life view has only 9% support. The fractured support allows for the effectiveness of using abortion as a wedge issue increasingly favorable for social liberals.

  5. buddyglass January 26, 2013 at 4:19 pm #

    Gallup used identical wording (“at least during the first three months”) for its “Overturn Roe?” question prior to 2005. After that it omitted that wording and just asked whether respondents would like to see Roe overturned without attempting to provide an explanation of the case. It didn’t make a big difference in peoples’ preferences. Can check results here:

    file:///C:/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/Roe_v_Wade_Anniv_130122.pdf

    See Q4. They did a split sample where one half got the full wording and one the abbreviated. With the full wording 68% wanted to keep Roe. With the abbreviated wording 63% wanted to keep Roe.

    Here’s the summary:

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/160058/majority-americans-support-roe-wade-decision.aspx

    They actually polled people about abortion in each trimester. The first trimester has wide support for legal abortion (61% “legal” + 6% “depends”). In the other two, support for legal abortion was in the minority.

    • buddyglass January 26, 2013 at 5:20 pm #

      Ooops. That first link was to the PDF’s link on my local drive after I downloaded it. You can view it here:

      http://www.gallup.com/file/poll/160067/Roe_v_Wade_Anniv_130122.pdf

    • James Stanton January 26, 2013 at 7:26 pm #

      Here’s where there is some dissonance in that we get bogged down with wording and phrasing in order to maximize our support and minimize the opposition. Its true that support for abortion rights is not as widespread as the pro-abortion crowd would like to make it appear but on the other hand the pro-life crowd also practices some deception seeing that we are every bit as absolutist on abortion and even on some forms of contraception use.

      That is to say.. abortion laws that restrict abortion to the first trimester are no “better” than abortion laws restricting it the second or third trimester.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Youth on the march … for life « - January 25, 2013

    […] Learn more about March for Life by clicking here. Related: A voice for the voiceless; NBC News misled us about American support for Roe […]

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes