Bigotry should be made of sterner stuff

I am not nearly as concerned with public boycotts of Chick-fil-a as I am with the potential abuse of government power by the mayors of Chicago and Boston. I’m glad to see that the editors of The National Review agree with me on this point in their article on the Chick-fil-a controversy. While defending Chick-fil-a executive Dan Cathy, the editors come down hard on Rahm Emanuel, the mayor of Chicago. They write:

Bigotry should be made of sterner stuff. Mr. Cathy did not even target homosexuals, and his reference to being married to “our first wives” indicates that his criticism of the recent decay of marriage is by no means limited to the question of same-sex marriage. But even if it were, it would be worth noting that opposition to gay marriage was until the day before yesterday the official position of President Barack Obama and his administration. It was certainly the position of the administration while Mr. Emanuel served in it — not to mention the position of the Clinton administration when Mr. Emanuel served in it, too. If a Chick-fil-A franchisee is a detestable bigot because his boss — a private-sector CEO — opposes gay marriage, what does that make Mr. Emanuel, whose boss opposed gay marriage as president of these United States?

Indeed the inconsistency on the part of Emanuel is staggering, not to mention unconstitutional. Mayor Tom Menino of Boston is no less culpable of moral and legal error.

Early this morning, the Baptist Press reported that both mayors have begun backpedaling on their threats to block Chick-fil-a. I am happy to hear that. But I am still very concerned about what we witnessed this week. The mayors showed us their hand. They revealed exactly how far they would go to discriminate against those who hold to traditional marriage. And they only pulled back from the brink after the backlash became too intense and the constitutional issues clear. In other words, we found out what they would do if they thought they could get away with it.

This time, they didn’t get away with it. Will there come a time when they—or some other person in a position of power—will get away with it? I believe there may be. Polls show the coming generation of young Americans to be very accepting of gay marriage. The demographic trends are going against defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Those trends indicate that there will come a time when the backlash against such action will be negligible and won’t be anything like we saw this week. Will the politicians back down from their threats when that day comes? When traditional marriage supporters are the clear minority?

Christians will have to remain vigilant. I believe that the controversy this week is only a foretaste of the religious liberty issues that we will face in coming days over the issue of gay marriage. This controversy is not ultimately about Chick-fil-a or boycotts. It’s about whether or not private citizens can hold views contrary to their government. It could hardly get more serious than that.

6 Responses to Bigotry should be made of sterner stuff

  1. A.D. Fountain July 27, 2012 at 7:23 pm #

    Blocking the construction of Chick-fil-a restaurants because of Dan Cathy’s religious beliefs or the corporation’s support of traditional marriage is not legally defensible. The mayors and alderman knew that from the get go; just as they knew that standing up and beating their chests would play well with their constituents. They have now been reminded of what they knew all along: we remain a nation of laws, not pandering politicians.

    • JamesStanton July 27, 2012 at 9:23 pm #

      These are manufactured political distractions to obscure the reality that the incumbent party has failed to ignite economic growth.

      The social liberals increasingly use gay marriage as a foil. The Bush WH used similar political tactics from the opposite end in 2004 when protect marriage initiatives where put on the ballot in many states. It helped get out the vote. The shoe is increasingly on the other foot. That’s why Obama “came out” on gay marriage. He sees the trends too.

      In my opinion, it is the nature capitalism in the US that will do far more to advance the cause of gay marriage or “gay rights” than any politician. The big corporations are generally controlled by people who worship profit not God. Advertising and PR connects the business world to the media and tv industry which are fairly supportive of gay marriage.

  2. Scott Fillmer July 31, 2012 at 7:24 am #

    It is a shame the church body could not stand more unified in it’s declaring homosexuality a sin. I often wonder how other believers can support or fight for people’s right to live in sin, to fight for sin is to fight against God. If there is a grey area I would rather fall to the side of God than the side of man every time, and the homosexuality debate is a debate for man to want to do it man’s ways and be justified.

    Chick-fil-a on the other hand (which I wrote on as well) has every right in this country to speak without the threat of mob-like thug politicians in Chicago.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Who Knew Chicken Could Be So Controversial? | owen strachan - July 30, 2012

    […] to ban it from their cities because of the stance the CFA head has taken on traditional marriage?  Denny Burk has some good thoughts on this strange and discomfiting […]

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes