To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
3 Comments
Brett
Interesting. It seems like they are adopting a more “traditional” approach. It actually sounds quite similar to Comfort’s Way of the Master stuff. I have always viewed YL as all about relational evangelism, and this document seems to be more about aggressive evangelism. Oh well, I don’t guess it should bother the leaders too bad.
The document actually seemed to allude to certain “orthodox” beliefs such as original sin, justification by faith, imputation of Christ’s righteousness, penal substitution, etc.
While there may be truths in all of these doctrines, and I certainly believe there are, there are inconsistencies with scripture as well. In our little pop evangelism courses, we have to remember that we can’t put God in a box and Christ came to earth for much more than to appease the wrath of God and die in our place on the cross for our sins. In fact, many views on the atonement have strengths and weaknesses…and yes, that includes penal substitution. While Jesus certainly was some sort of substitution for us, there is much more to it and that doesn’t mean that every word of penal substitution wraps up God’s whole reason for sending his son.
What are some of the thoughts you other people have?
scott
perhaps someone can help me here, but i would like to know what is so bad about focusing on penal substitution during personal evangelism? i agree that Jesus’ death was about more than just paying for sins, but what is most important for someone to understand to be saved? Jesus may have died to bring his kingdom to earth, reconcile all of creation, etc, but it seems the most important thing that we should start with is the need to repent and believe in Christ for forgiveness of sin.
if someone believes that Jesus came and died to “put the world to rights”, but doesn’t have any understanding of personal sin, what good is that?
Jesica
Isn’t everything that Jesus did wrapped up in the truth that He came to reconcile mankind to God?
And, that repentance is required along with confession in order to receive that reconciliation?
Whether it was healing the sick or setting captives free, it still is all wrapped up the fact that Jesus is the Redeemer of mankind. The propitiation for our sin debt.
Without Him, there would be no part in the Kindgom of Heaven for any of us.
I read the whole 8 page statement, and I wanted to cheer for the Young Life leaders!