To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I’m not entirely sure whether I would want to go through chemo-therapy either if I was told it wouldn’t save my life anyway—only give me a couple more miserable years. When you add the pregnancy into the mix, the decision should be a matter of course.
The question facing voters at the polls would likely include whether or not a candidate thought that there should BE a ‘decision’ . . .
is this one of the areas where legislation will be introduced to forbid chemotherapy to pregnant women as a matter ‘of course’;
or is this an area reserved for the mother, her family, and her doctors to decide ?
I think the young woman was very good to want for her baby to live and to be well. I do not know if chemo would have saved her life, or, if used, in the process, it would have harmed the infant . . .
but she at least made the decision for her baby’s sake . . . and that is a mother’s love at its most unselfish.
The voting public will need clear parameters about what kinds of legislation might be coming down the pike to be planned that, if in place now, would have taken that mother’s decision away from her.
The public has a right to know before going to the polls.
This is something some people don’t seem to understand: Doctors WILL NOT perform chemo on a woman known to be pregnant, because they could be sued. They will only perform chemo AFTER the child has been aborted.
Yes, I know, it’s completely illogical. “We don’t want to do chemo on you because you’re pregnant, and it might harm the baby. Of course, if you’d like us to do an abortion, we’d be happy to kill your child directly so you can proceed with the treatment.”