To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
10 Comments
rachel hood
Thank you, friend. Makes me weep.
Kathryn Elliott Stegall
Thank you, Justin!
Pingback:
Paul Reed
A beautiful message, if only we could get anyone (including those who call themselves pro-life) to believe it. Pro-aborts will win until we can address a lot of questions. If the clip were to show a canister of 20 frozen embryos and in the trash, would we really take that as seriously as Sandy Hook? And we all believe that the shooter deserves life in prison for killing a kid, but who on here will admit that a woman who kills her own kid deserves the same punishment? We’ve got a lot of cognitive dissonance to work out if we ever want to win this debate against the pro-aborts.
John Thweatt
Powerful!
Evan May
“We’ve got a lot of cognitive dissonance to work out if we ever want to win this debate against the pro-aborts.”
I’m not sure what “cognitive dissonance” is involved in the decision to stop killing innocent children.
Natalie Trust (@NatalieTrust)
Powerful. Thank you for sharing this.
Paul Reed
@Evan May
If you can’t figure out the cognitive dissonance in the belief that the unborn is human, and that a woman who kills one shouldn’t go to jail, then I’m not sure really how to explain it to you. I thought that should have been simple enough, and I don’t know how to make it simpler.
Jackie Evans
I fully understand the cognitive dissanance… The idea in our society that is is ok to deliberately kill millions of children in the womb, but not ok to kill 20 children in a classroom just doesn’t fit together. All childrens lives are either precious or they aren’t… the method of how they are killed is irrelevant.
Pingback: