Godless virtue is no virtue at all

I’ve been reading through Jonathan Edwards’ treatise on The Nature of True Virtue. This book can only be properly understood in connection with Edwards’ earlier work The End for Which God Created the World. In that earlier work, Edwards shows that God is the first and best of beings and that the purpose of all things in God’s universe is to glorify God’s own magnificence and goodness.

In The Nature of True Virtue, Edwards argues that true virtue consists in having one’s heart attuned to that great reality—the glory of God. Virtue, therefore, can only exist in those who know and love God above all else. Edwards says it this way,

And therefore certainly, unless we will be atheists, we must allow that true virtue does primarily and most essentially consist in a supreme love to God; and that where this is wanting, there can be no true virtue. -Yale Edition, p. 554

In other words, moral uprightness may be a dim shadow of virtue, but it is not true virtue if it has no respect to God. Only an atheist—or someone whose view of God is so low that he no longer conceives of the true God—can deny that true virtue must be defined this way.

This means that all systems of morality—secular or religious—that ignore God are not truly virtuous. Those who follow them—no matter how rigorously they follow—are not truly virtuous. In short, godless virtue is no virtue at all.

If this is true (and I believe that it is), the implications are staggering.

9 Responses to Godless virtue is no virtue at all

  1. Dan Phillips December 2, 2014 at 10:29 am #

    Oh, your commentators are going to hate this!

    The ones who aren’t me, anyway.

  2. Christiane Smith December 2, 2014 at 12:17 pm #

    I wonder how Edwards might have viewed this comment:
    “in the heart of every man of good will, Grace works in an unseen way. . . “

  3. Esther O'Reilly December 2, 2014 at 12:50 pm #

    So then, from a Calvinist perspective, what exactly IS common grace?

  4. Adam December 2, 2014 at 2:17 pm #

    From a theistic point of view, it’s hard to disagree with Edwards. That said, we do have to make sense of our linguistic practices that attribute praiseworthiness to people who reject belief in God. I try to do that in this paper if anyone is interested: https://www.academia.edu/5230958/Ethical_Contextualism

  5. James Stanton December 2, 2014 at 3:07 pm #

    “This means that all systems of morality—secular or religious—that ignore God are not truly virtuous.”

    The implications are indeed staggering. Does it apply to the morality of capitalism as we practice it in the US?

    • Christiane Smith December 2, 2014 at 8:49 pm #

      Hi JAMES,
      that is a very thought-provoking question . . . and in the sense of what some have called ‘vulture capitalism’, your question raises some serious issues that Christian people must begin to ponder and respond to in this country, for the sake of the integrity of the gospel of Our Lord and of our Christian witness to that gospel.

  6. Ryan Davidson December 2, 2014 at 8:39 pm #

    There’s a reason why the theology of Edwards was referred to as experimental Calvinism. That’s because it departs at certain respects from the Reformers who preceded him. This quote illustrates one such departure.

    Edwards here implicitly denies the value of general revelation, and makes Christian ethics depend on the subjective stirrings of the human heart. One sees nothing of the sort in Luther, Calvin, Vermigli, Beza, etc. In this sense, we may well view Edwards as an American Schleiermacher.

    • Kenneth Abbott December 3, 2014 at 1:49 pm #

      I’d like to read more on this, but I’m inclined to disagree, Ryan. Experimental (or experiential) Calvinism was the meat of English Puritanism–living one’s life consistent with one’s doctrine. I like to tell my Sunday school classes that orthopraxy follows orthodoxy–right living follows right belief. It is also true than wrong living follows wrong belief. As a man thinks in his heart, so he is.

      From what I know of Edwards, I can’t credit ascribing to him a radical subjectivism that ignores revelation in any form.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Saturday Post(s) | A Pilgrim's Friend - December 6, 2014

    […] Non-Christians Are Incapable of True Virtue. That was my own title based on this very short thought that Denny Burk takes from Jonathan Edwards. As he says, “The implications are staggering.” […]

Comment here. Please use FIRST and LAST name.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes