Skip to Content
Search for specific content:
Browse content by category:

Essential Books for Understanding Christianity

books2.jpgIn today’s Wall Street Journal, George Weigel gives his Top 5 “Essential books for understanding Christianity.” I’m glad that he picked one old book, Dante’s Divine Comedy, but the other four are all from the 20th century. It seems rather odd to suggest that four of the five essential books for understanding a two-thousand year old religion would all have been written within the last twenty-five years.

In any case, it seems to me that Weigel left off one fairly influential volume. As it turns out, this particular book has been pretty helpful for Christians throughout the history of the church. Needless to say, my “Top 5″ would have looked a little bit different.

← CNN’s “After Jesus” — What is Christmas all about? →

Discussion

1. Dec 23, 2006—6:23 pm | Permalink Barcificus says

So what are you now, KJV only? Geez!

2. Dec 23, 2006—8:23 pm | Permalink Kris Weinschenker says

I guess the Wall Street Journal overlooked the Bible, huh?

3. Dec 23, 2006—10:21 pm | Permalink dennyrburk says

Barcificus,

I was afraid people would think that. I just wanted a picture of the Bible. I’m not a partisan for any one translation.

Luf,
Denny

4. Dec 24, 2006—2:05 pm | Permalink Kris Weinschenker says

I only use the KJV to use Strong’s Concordence.

It IS the most difficult version to read.

5. Dec 24, 2006—10:40 pm | Permalink Barcificus says

In 1611 the word came down out of heaven.

Just remember:
KJV ALONE = The Word of God ALONE

Peace out.

6. Dec 26, 2006—11:58 am | Permalink Debbie says

I like KJV to read the Psalms and prayers.
I don’t care for the Message and other paraphrases or the TNIV.

7. Dec 26, 2006—8:03 pm | Permalink Kris Weinschenker says

The NIV is a pretty decent translation. So is the NKJV.

The KJV didn’t have the number of manuscripts that are now available to properly translate it.

I prefer reading the Living Bible, a “thought by thought” translation, as it is SO MUCH EASIER to read.

8. Dec 27, 2006—12:24 pm | Permalink Debbie says

I’m refering to Today’s NIV. They try to make it more gender friendly making it full of error.

9. Dec 28, 2006—6:54 am | Permalink Mark says

So Denny what would your top five be?

Join the Discussion




*Required


You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>