I would like to thank three of the editors at Touchstone magazine who have taken the time to participate in the conversation that we have been having on this blog. Of course the conversation that I am referring to is the one about gender (here, here, and here). The editors are S. M. Hutchens, David Mills, and Anthony Esolen. Two posts have appeared on the Touchstone blog that refer to our debate.â€œBurkâ€™s Readers On Hutchensâ€ -by David Mills
â€œAll Flattened Things are Equalâ€ -by Anthony Esolen
This conversation started on September 7 when I wrote a brief note on S. M. Hutchensâ€™ review of John G. Stackhouseâ€™s book Finally Feminist: A Pragmatic Christian Understanding of Gender. Itâ€™s almost twenty days later, and I am still getting comments on that post, including another one just a fews days ago from Hutchens himself.
I think Anthony Esolenâ€™s reflections on this conversation are apt. He writes on the Touchstone blog:
Nor have the â€œegalitariansâ€ anything really interesting to say about the sexes â€” because their form of egalitarianism is really indifferentism, leveling distinctions by denying that they exist. . . And once we have done that, it is doubtful that we have remained Christian. The egalitarian â€” the indifferentist â€” becomes unitarian, reconceiving the self-revealed God according to the vanity of his own rather dull imagination.