<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theological Interpretation of Scripture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/</link>
	<description>A commentary on theology, politics, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/#comment-59329</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/#comment-59329</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
An interesting observation. A theological interpretation of Scripture presumes that the Bible comprises a theologically unified whole. However, just exactly what that theology is is determined by ones presuppositions and methodology. By the way, TIS has been a hallmark of conservative RC theology for centuries. So, whether one accepts or rejects TIS has to do with what the Bible is, rather than what it says. It is a methodology, but it can be pressed into service by anyone with any agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
An interesting observation. A theological interpretation of Scripture presumes that the Bible comprises a theologically unified whole. However, just exactly what that theology is is determined by ones presuppositions and methodology. By the way, TIS has been a hallmark of conservative RC theology for centuries. So, whether one accepts or rejects TIS has to do with what the Bible is, rather than what it says. It is a methodology, but it can be pressed into service by anyone with any agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Templin</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/#comment-59272</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Templin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/#comment-59272</guid>
		<description>Sweet Dr. Berry is in there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet Dr. Berry is in there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/#comment-59271</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/theological-interpretation-of-scripture/#comment-59271</guid>
		<description>so, do you have any initial thoughts on the theological interpretation of scripture? i see people all over the place claiming to practice it, from liberation theologians to postcolonial theologians. just curious what your own thoughts are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, do you have any initial thoughts on the theological interpretation of scripture? i see people all over the place claiming to practice it, from liberation theologians to postcolonial theologians. just curious what your own thoughts are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

