<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Security Evangelicals?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/</link>
	<description>A commentary on theology, politics, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denny Burk &#187; Giuliani Out: Thereâ€™s Still One Pro-life Party</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-29622</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny Burk &#187; Giuliani Out: Thereâ€™s Still One Pro-life Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-29622</guid>
		<description>[...] August 21, 2007: &#8220;A pro-choice candidate cannot win the Republican primaries. The aversion to abortion among the Republican base is substantial, and Giuliani will not be able to overcome it. . . Social conservatives will not support Rudy Giuliani. In my view, Giuliani&#8217;s candidacy is DOA.&#8221;   &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 21, 2007: &#8220;A pro-choice candidate cannot win the Republican primaries. The aversion to abortion among the Republican base is substantial, and Giuliani will not be able to overcome it. . . Social conservatives will not support Rudy Giuliani. In my view, Giuliani&#8217;s candidacy is DOA.&#8221;   &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13195</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that we should always vote for the lesser of two evils.  Sometimes we shouldn&#039;t vote.  

To tell you the truth, I&#039;m not convinced really that Rudy is that much better than Hillary.  

When it comes to the isssues that I care about, both of them are anti-marriage and anti-baby.  I don&#039;t really see much of a difference.

But I would be surprised if Rudy picks up the GOP ticket.  I don&#039;t think that he will get it.  He&#039;s just socially liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that we should always vote for the lesser of two evils.  Sometimes we shouldn&#8217;t vote.  </p>
<p>To tell you the truth, I&#8217;m not convinced really that Rudy is that much better than Hillary.  </p>
<p>When it comes to the isssues that I care about, both of them are anti-marriage and anti-baby.  I don&#8217;t really see much of a difference.</p>
<p>But I would be surprised if Rudy picks up the GOP ticket.  I don&#8217;t think that he will get it.  He&#8217;s just socially liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jigawatt</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13165</link>
		<dc:creator>jigawatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13165</guid>
		<description>Stu, I disagree.  There are plenty of situations where there would be no candidate that I could pull the lever for.

It is certainly an acceptable choice for believers to abstain from voting.  And I have to agree with Daniel, if it came down to Rudy or Hillary, I myself would abstain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stu, I disagree.  There are plenty of situations where there would be no candidate that I could pull the lever for.</p>
<p>It is certainly an acceptable choice for believers to abstain from voting.  And I have to agree with Daniel, if it came down to Rudy or Hillary, I myself would abstain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13157</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13157</guid>
		<description>Daniel,
I&#039;m sorry but what your planning is not acceptable. The only acceptable response is to vote for the least destructive candidate and then move forward working hard to be sure that neither &quot;unacceptable&quot; can win another or future election.
Not voting is giving the country  away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,<br />
I&#8217;m sorry but what your planning is not acceptable. The only acceptable response is to vote for the least destructive candidate and then move forward working hard to be sure that neither &#8220;unacceptable&#8221; can win another or future election.<br />
Not voting is giving the country  away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13153</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13153</guid>
		<description>Rudy would be a horrible choice.  If my choices were Rudy or Hillary, I wouldn&#039;t vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy would be a horrible choice.  If my choices were Rudy or Hillary, I wouldn&#8217;t vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13148</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13148</guid>
		<description>No fan of Rudy But and a big But he may be the only one that can win... Those fools in Ohio how happy are they with this congess led by libs, and how will they like another clinton running the ship into an iceberg....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No fan of Rudy But and a big But he may be the only one that can win&#8230; Those fools in Ohio how happy are they with this congess led by libs, and how will they like another clinton running the ship into an iceberg&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Van Neste</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Van Neste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13133</guid>
		<description>Right on Denny.
The assesment in the article even begs the question of whether the current war on terror really provides more security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Denny.<br />
The assesment in the article even begs the question of whether the current war on terror really provides more security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13112</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13112</guid>
		<description>Looks like he could&#039;ve had a V8!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like he could&#8217;ve had a V8!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13110</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13110</guid>
		<description>Another great choice of picture, Denny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great choice of picture, Denny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Chediak</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-security-evangelicals/#comment-13095</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Chediak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=839#comment-13095</guid>
		<description>Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

