Comments on: ‘The Righteousness of God’ in Paul http://www.dennyburk.com/the-righteousness-of-god-in-paul/ A commentary on theology, politics, and culture Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:54:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: http://renewingthoughts.blogspot.com/ http://www.dennyburk.com/the-righteousness-of-god-in-paul/#comment-47137 http://renewingthoughts.blogspot.com/ Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:52:01 +0000 http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2791#comment-47137 hope you have had an enjoyable time at ETS. Is it possible to get a copy of your paper? -Charile hope you have had an enjoyable time at ETS. Is it possible to get a copy of your paper?

-Charile

]]> By: John Holmberg http://www.dennyburk.com/the-righteousness-of-god-in-paul/#comment-47105 John Holmberg Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:45:41 +0000 http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2791#comment-47105 You're just too unpredictable for me Denny :-) You’re just too unpredictable for me Denny :-)

]]> By: Denny Burk http://www.dennyburk.com/the-righteousness-of-god-in-paul/#comment-47104 Denny Burk Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:27:06 +0000 http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2791#comment-47104 The 'ground rumbling' remark was meant tongue in cheek. I guess that was a bust! The ‘ground rumbling’ remark was meant tongue in cheek. I guess that was a bust!

]]> By: Luke Britt http://www.dennyburk.com/the-righteousness-of-god-in-paul/#comment-47101 Luke Britt Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:45:37 +0000 http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2791#comment-47101 I would love to read it. I would love to read it.

]]> By: Michael Metts http://www.dennyburk.com/the-righteousness-of-god-in-paul/#comment-47096 Michael Metts Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:28:22 +0000 http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2791#comment-47096 Would, or how would, this affect transformative and forensic righteousness? Would, or how would, this affect transformative and forensic righteousness?

]]> By: John Holmberg http://www.dennyburk.com/the-righteousness-of-god-in-paul/#comment-47095 John Holmberg Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:06:17 +0000 http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2791#comment-47095 Why would the "ground start rumbling"? Are you alluding to it being controversial? Because if so, I fail to see how it is. Are you indicating that you will make exegetes mad by excluding the use of the genitive? I don't know why anybody would get upset about this. Personally I'm puzzled by this language of Paul. At least your paper is on the Bible and isn't defending America from being too imperial ;-) Why would the “ground start rumbling”? Are you alluding to it being controversial? Because if so, I fail to see how it is. Are you indicating that you will make exegetes mad by excluding the use of the genitive? I don’t know why anybody would get upset about this. Personally I’m puzzled by this language of Paul.

At least your paper is on the Bible and isn’t defending America from being too imperial ;-)

]]>