The Phony YouTube Debate

On Wednesday night, CNN hosted a “YouTube” debate for the Republican candidates for President. Questions came to the candidates from “ordinary” citizens who videoed themselves asking questions about the important issues of our time. Anderson Cooper hosted the event for CNN, and it came off without a hitch . . . until the post debate discussion.

During the debate, a retired brigadier general who is also a homosexual asked a pointed question to the candidates about gays in the military. The general was then allowed to grandstand from the audience floor for two minutes (which was met with boos from the audience). After the debate, Anderson Cooper and William Bennett were giving their analysis when William Bennett blew the gaffe. A simple Google search reveals that the questioner has served on a steering committee for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

What’s the significance of all this? Well, I think Peggy Noonan has nailed it in her column today for the Wall Street Journal. It begins with an imaginary scene from a Democrat debate earlier this fall. She writes:

I will never forget that breathtaking moment when, in the CNN/YouTube debate earlier this fall, the woman from Ohio held up a picture and said, “Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Obama, Mr. Edwards, this is a human fetus. Given a few more months, it will be a baby you could hold in your arms. You all say you’re ‘for the children.’ I would ask you to look America in the eye and tell us how you can support laws to end this life. Thank you.”

They were momentarily nonplussed, then awkwardly struggled to answer, to regain lost high ground. One of them, John Edwards I think, finally criticizing the woman for being “manipulative,” using “hot images” and indulging in “the politics of personal destruction.” The woman then stood in the audience for her follow up. “I beg your pardon, but the literal politics of personal destruction–of destroying a person–is what you stand for.”

Oh, I wish I weren’t about to say, “Wait, that didn’t happen.” For of course it did not. Who of our media masters would allow a question so piercing on such a painful and politically incorrect subject?

I thought of this the other night when citizens who turned out to be partisans for Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Obama and Mr. Edwards asked the Republicans, in debate, would Jesus support the death penalty, do you believe every word of the Bible, and what does the Confederate flag mean to you?

It was a good debate, feisty and revealing. It’s not bad that the questions had a certain spin, and played on stereotypes of the GOP. It’s just bad that it doesn’t quite happen at Democratic debates. Somehow, there, an obscure restraint sets in on the part of news producers. Too bad. Running for most powerful person in the world is, among other things, an act of startling presumption. They all should be grilled, everyone, both sides. Winter voting approaches; may many chestnuts be roasted on an open fire.

I couldn’t agree more. Yet I think it’s really unfortunate that we likely will never see pro-choice candidates “roasted” about their views on the greatest human rights crisis of our time: the legal killing of over 40 million unborn humans since 1973. It’s the greatest human rights crisis of our time, but you wouldn’t know it from the media who preside over the Presidential debates. I think they could do better, but I’m not holding my breath that they will.

Read the rest here: “Death, Taxes and Mrs. Clinton: Only two of them are inevitable” – by Peggy Noonan (Wall Street Journal).

9 Responses to The Phony YouTube Debate

  1. Andrew Walker November 30, 2007 at 9:52 am #

    amen, Denny, amen.

  2. Charlie Wallace November 30, 2007 at 10:23 am #

    Great post. Republicans do seem to be easy targets. To present the situation with the fetus presented above would be deemed insensitive I’m sure – however, those who select the YouTube videos to be shown would NEVER select that one.

  3. Paul November 30, 2007 at 12:29 pm #

    I might very well choke and die right here on the spot, but I have to say…

    Denny, you’re absolutely right. The debates on both sides are an absolute sham. These guys need to be asked the tough — and I mean TOUGH questions.

    Dems need to be asked about their pro-choice stances. Republicans need to be asked about how they would get medical coverage to the 40 million Americans without health insurance. Dems need to be asked about how to fix a broken manufacturing industry (for all of their union touting…they never really have an answer for this one). Republicans need to be asked about how they would ease the burdens on students, now that a collegiate education is an absolute necessity in order to maintain even a middle class lifestyle.

    Instead, for the most part, they all get softball questions. The republicans get asked about security, and the democrats get asked about health care. Too easy.

  4. Rose November 30, 2007 at 12:39 pm #

    Would you and Barry please run for President and VP? I really don’t care who is who, but right now a Burk/Joslin or Joslin/Burk ticket really sounds fantastic…

  5. Barry November 30, 2007 at 1:48 pm #

    Rose,
    Denny is WAY to liberal to agree to running with me. Ha! Maybe president of the SBC . . .

    BCJ

  6. Don December 2, 2007 at 10:08 am #

    Paul, When I post you tear me apart but I have to say you are 100% right. {on this one} These so called debates are a joke but it’s Not Funny…

  7. Lucas Knisely December 2, 2007 at 12:20 pm #

    And I like how a member of Hillary’s campaign got to ask a question about gays in the military and it wasn’t disclosed until after the debate. Awesome.

  8. Don December 2, 2007 at 1:49 pm #

    Lucas, It would not have come out if not for Bill Bennet telling anderson cooper that he had been bombed with E-mails from people claiming that Gen. was on clinton’s steering panel on gays. Then cooper said “oh I didn’t know that” BS cnn AKA {clinton news network} flew this guy to the debate. Hey they got caught again with their pants down but they made the point of having the candidates talk about silly stuff instead of real issues. The man who would have said “Hey cooper I came here to talk about real issues that Americans are concerned about ” and walked off the stage would be leading in the polls today. “I didn’t come here to answer questions from a cartoon figure” Boom walk off. That goes for the dems too. This is real stuff not a joke.

  9. Steve December 4, 2007 at 8:34 pm #

    Well Denny, Mike Huckabee made it to the Australian News media today as THE authentic blue collar guy representing America’s hopes.
    He was portrayed as not only a real contender for the presidency, but possibly the BEST contender.

Comment here. Please use FIRST and LAST name.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes