<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Faith of Tim Russert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:03:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38997</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38997</guid>
		<description>Brent, I totally agree with you.  Dr. Tom Schreiner preached a great sermon on that in Houston a few months ago- that we are not the Champion in that story, Christ is.  The connection that I was making wasn&#039;t necessarily between myself and David, as much as it was that the same God that felled the physical giant can just as easily fell intellectual giants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent, I totally agree with you.  Dr. Tom Schreiner preached a great sermon on that in Houston a few months ago- that we are not the Champion in that story, Christ is.  The connection that I was making wasn&#8217;t necessarily between myself and David, as much as it was that the same God that felled the physical giant can just as easily fell intellectual giants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38975</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38975</guid>
		<description>I agree with Paul.  It would great to see him debate Ravi.  But I doubt that would happen, I think Hitch would be afraid of Ravi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Paul.  It would great to see him debate Ravi.  But I doubt that would happen, I think Hitch would be afraid of Ravi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38889</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38889</guid>
		<description>The problem with relating to the David and Goliath story is that &lt;i&gt;everyone&lt;/i&gt; thinks they&#039;re David.  Geez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with relating to the David and Goliath story is that <i>everyone</i> thinks they&#8217;re David.  Geez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38707</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38707</guid>
		<description>(should have said &quot;On my own, I could not win in a debate with Hitchens...&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(should have said &#8220;On my own, I could not win in a debate with Hitchens&#8230;&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38706</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38706</guid>
		<description>I would have accepted Russert&#039;s offer, and here&#039;s why.  I, like Meacham, am no match for Hitchen&#039;s intellect and wit.  However, I stand on the side of truth.  The Gospel is the truth.  No matter how intellectual or witty falsehood may be, it is still falsehood and cannot stand up against the truth.  

On my own, there is no chance that I would win such a debate.  But &quot;who is this uncircumcised Philistine that he should defy the armies of the living God?&quot;

The same God who is sovereign over physical giants is sovereign over intellectual giants.

Before you count these words as great faith (if you count them anything at all), let me put them in their place:  My faith is nothing to write home about, so to speak.  My faith is minuscule.  But my God is great.  I could not win in a debate with Hitchens, but my God would have no more trouble with him than He had with Goliath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have accepted Russert&#8217;s offer, and here&#8217;s why.  I, like Meacham, am no match for Hitchen&#8217;s intellect and wit.  However, I stand on the side of truth.  The Gospel is the truth.  No matter how intellectual or witty falsehood may be, it is still falsehood and cannot stand up against the truth.  </p>
<p>On my own, there is no chance that I would win such a debate.  But &#8220;who is this uncircumcised Philistine that he should defy the armies of the living God?&#8221;</p>
<p>The same God who is sovereign over physical giants is sovereign over intellectual giants.</p>
<p>Before you count these words as great faith (if you count them anything at all), let me put them in their place:  My faith is nothing to write home about, so to speak.  My faith is minuscule.  But my God is great.  I could not win in a debate with Hitchens, but my God would have no more trouble with him than He had with Goliath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38690</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38690</guid>
		<description>Ken, 

I agree that Meacham is not the guy to debate Hitchens.  However, I disagree that Bahnsen or Craig could do it either.  The one time I saw Craig at an apologetics conference, I saw him pulling the ultimate debate no-no, using the Bible to back up the Bible.

On the other hand, I honestly think that Ravi Zaccharias could verbally slap Hitchens around quite a bit and would be a truly fascinating debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, </p>
<p>I agree that Meacham is not the guy to debate Hitchens.  However, I disagree that Bahnsen or Craig could do it either.  The one time I saw Craig at an apologetics conference, I saw him pulling the ultimate debate no-no, using the Bible to back up the Bible.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I honestly think that Ravi Zaccharias could verbally slap Hitchens around quite a bit and would be a truly fascinating debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38674</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38674</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if the encounter between Meacham and Hitchens ever took place; if not, Meacham was right to demur.  His is not the right style to go up against the likes of Christopher Hitchens.  Someone in the vein of Greg Bahnsen or William Lane Craig--a guy who knows the philosophical issues and the history cold and can think on his feet--is far more suitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if the encounter between Meacham and Hitchens ever took place; if not, Meacham was right to demur.  His is not the right style to go up against the likes of Christopher Hitchens.  Someone in the vein of Greg Bahnsen or William Lane Craig&#8211;a guy who knows the philosophical issues and the history cold and can think on his feet&#8211;is far more suitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/the-faith-of-tim-russert/comment-page-1/#comment-38666</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=2142#comment-38666</guid>
		<description>Good reminder that despite the divide that exists between Protestants and Catholics, there is a simple Gospel which many on both sides still believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good reminder that despite the divide that exists between Protestants and Catholics, there is a simple Gospel which many on both sides still believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
