I just got home from seeing “Orphan.” It was more entertaining than I thought it’d be, and had a plot twist that no one could have seen coming. I highly doubt Russell Moore saw this movie. It’s not about stereotyping orphans or giving them a bad name. It’s about one particularly deranged orphan. But yet again, certain people in the Chrisian community feel it’s their duty to take on anything they don’t agree with. Let he without sin cast the first stone, Mr. Russell.

it is a problem that orphan children are the weaker part of this issue , they wait for results without being able to do anything..

In this country alone there are over 500,000 children in the foster care system. Worldwide, the U.N. estimates there are more than 145 million orphans. To put this into a number easier to understand, my oldest daughter, Manisha, now 18, was adopted from Nepal when she was three. The estimated population of Nepal is around 28 million. That means there are over four times as many orphans in the world as there are people in her native country.

Expressed another way, the population of the United States, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, as of July 21, 2009, is 306,969,874. That means the number of orphans in the world equals half the population of our country.

If the word “orphan” is searched on Google today, the first two listings are for the movie “Orphan.” What a lost opportunity to speak the truth in love! The Wikipedia definition is third: “An orphan is a child permanently bereaved of its parents.”

The real horror is not that the movie portrays orphans as monsters. It’s the number of children that will be hurt by this disturbing message. The movie “Orphan” is only going to reinforce in the hearts and minds of individuals that orphans are damaged goods at best, monsters at worse.

Those who have thought about adopting may have second thoughts, plagued with fears and doubts. Children and teenagers who have been adopted and hear about or see the movie might be tempted to question their own self‑worth or value. Orphans who might have been adopted may not be because of the ill‑conceived notion, perpetuated by this movie, that they are “bad.”

“Orphan” is a sad commentary on Hollywood, our society, and a tragic statement of the culture we live in. A world where money is the bottom line and sensationalism tickles the ears of gullible listeners—let it not be at the expense of those who are the least fortunate. Instead, as in the words of flight director, Gene Kranz, as portrayed in the movie “Apollo 13,” when everyone doubted that the space program would be able to bring those doomed astronauts home, he stood up and said, “With all due respect, sir, I believe this is gonna be our finest hour.”

I challenge every American, particularly those who are Christians, to look beyond the movie at the real horror—the little one who has no one to call mommy or daddy; the baby who goes to bed at night with a protruding, empty belly; the 145 million children around the world who, through no fault of their own, have lost their parents to AIDS, malnutrition, poverty, and violence.

Although all orphans have needs, some more than others, they are not monsters. They are children with beating hearts, sticky fingers, and minds full of unleashed potential. They just need to be given a chance. They are children made in the image of Christ and loved by the heavenly Father.

Rather than attacking the movie, let’s join together and rewrite the script of “Orphan.” Give an orphan a chance to worship in our church and synagogue. Invite one to sit down at the dinner table. Help all of them to be educated in schools. Let us change the negative image of an orphan one life at a time. Let us encourage them to dream big dreams and become everything God created them to be. Most of all, let us show the world that they are loved, just as Christ loved us.

If it were not for God’s unconditional love, we would all be orphans. If we unite, we can send a far different message to Hollywood. We can speak for those little ones that sit in overcrowded orphanages and wait. And hope.

Through God’s love, let us love until we feel their pain. Only then can we make a difference. Let us not let Hollywood have the last word. Truly, we can become the hand of God as we touch one of His own. Let it begin with me. Orphans Deserve Better. Let this be “our finest hour.”

Well…

Julia Roberts in “Pelican Brief” and “Erin Brockovich.” Tom Cruise in “The Firm.” Russell Crowe in “The Insider.” The list would stretch for miles but when are environmentalists, labor or whistle-blower characters not sympathetic? When is a Bible-reading preacher sympathetic? Do this: picture a scene in your mind where the camera keeps cutting from a preacher in garb reading his Bible and a boy knocking at his door – when would a mainstream movie NOT have this as a prelude to that boy being terribly exploited in some way?

In American cinema, I notice that there are some character types who are almost always evil and some who are almost always sympathetic characters. Industrial moguls, preachers, clowns, and add to this incomplete list orphans and stepmoms – these are always on the bad list. Good list (partial): environmentalists, free-love hippies, labor, journalists, etc.

Of course, Hollywood is Hollywood. Movie-makers have always been out to make a buck, since the first Edison-invented moving pictures flickered to life. But movie-makers have both biases and influence. The stereotypes communicate their biases and influence others.