<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on the Rick Warren Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/</link>
	<description>A commentary on theology, politics, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prentice Park</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47658</link>
		<dc:creator>Prentice Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47658</guid>
		<description>If we have to pick and choose who we are pray, that seems to be contrary to Jesus&#039; teachings. Now, I understand the question here is NOT about whether we should pray for somebody or not but rather, is it appropriate for a Christian who has a different theological paradigm pray for somebody in a large public setting? I believe, we can always find a way to pray for somebody else, no matter how differing the perspectives are. Just a quick thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we have to pick and choose who we are pray, that seems to be contrary to Jesus&#8217; teachings. Now, I understand the question here is NOT about whether we should pray for somebody or not but rather, is it appropriate for a Christian who has a different theological paradigm pray for somebody in a large public setting? I believe, we can always find a way to pray for somebody else, no matter how differing the perspectives are. Just a quick thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47641</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47641</guid>
		<description>Regardless, let us pray for Rick Warren, that he might pray in a manner that reflects rich glory upon Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless, let us pray for Rick Warren, that he might pray in a manner that reflects rich glory upon Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47639</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47639</guid>
		<description>December 19, 2008 

Dear President-elect Obama, 

Your decision to invite Reverend Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at your inauguration alienates American atheists, humanists, agnostics and other nontheists. 
In an interview with Larry King in August, Warren expressed an unwillingness to ever vote for an atheist presidential candidate. Would you allow a speaker who expressed similar views about, for example, Jews or Muslims to participate in your inaugural? He has said the only reason nontheists are ethical is because his god makes them so, and that not believing in a god is intellectually dishonest. 

Your spokesperson has said that yours will be &quot;the most inclusive, open, accessible inauguration in American history.&quot; How is opening the program with one Protestant Christian and closing it with another inclusive? You yourself said it would include a wide range of viewpoints. Who on your inaugural dais will express the viewpoints of not only the tens of millions of nontheistic Americans, but that majority of citizens who believe there is now too much religious influence in our politics and government? 

By choosing an intolerant religious leader to open your presidency, you are not creating change, but rather following the dismal tradition of your predecessor. 

Sincerely, 
Lori Lipman Brown 
Director

Secular Coalition

----------
Inclusive is supposed to exclude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>December 19, 2008 </p>
<p>Dear President-elect Obama, </p>
<p>Your decision to invite Reverend Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at your inauguration alienates American atheists, humanists, agnostics and other nontheists.<br />
In an interview with Larry King in August, Warren expressed an unwillingness to ever vote for an atheist presidential candidate. Would you allow a speaker who expressed similar views about, for example, Jews or Muslims to participate in your inaugural? He has said the only reason nontheists are ethical is because his god makes them so, and that not believing in a god is intellectually dishonest. </p>
<p>Your spokesperson has said that yours will be &#8220;the most inclusive, open, accessible inauguration in American history.&#8221; How is opening the program with one Protestant Christian and closing it with another inclusive? You yourself said it would include a wide range of viewpoints. Who on your inaugural dais will express the viewpoints of not only the tens of millions of nontheistic Americans, but that majority of citizens who believe there is now too much religious influence in our politics and government? </p>
<p>By choosing an intolerant religious leader to open your presidency, you are not creating change, but rather following the dismal tradition of your predecessor. </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Lori Lipman Brown<br />
Director</p>
<p>Secular Coalition</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Inclusive is supposed to exclude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Svoboda</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47637</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Svoboda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47637</guid>
		<description>Darius, great word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darius, great word!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Svoboda</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47636</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Svoboda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47636</guid>
		<description>Darius,

One some issues, you are right, he is pretty moderate.  The issues of abortion and gay marriage I do not think he has a moderate stance.  He seems to be as conservative as anyone on those 2 issues.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darius,</p>
<p>One some issues, you are right, he is pretty moderate.  The issues of abortion and gay marriage I do not think he has a moderate stance.  He seems to be as conservative as anyone on those 2 issues.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47635</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47635</guid>
		<description>Well your right, you werenâ€™t asked.  The same kind of criticism was leveled at Billy Graham, you know the guy with his name on the evangelism school at SBTS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well your right, you werenâ€™t asked.  The same kind of criticism was leveled at Billy Graham, you know the guy with his name on the evangelism school at SBTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius T</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47634</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47634</guid>
		<description>Don, that article IS a commentary, obviously she&#039;s going to give her position.  If it were supposed to be a neutral news piece, then it would be much more concerning.  As such, lefties almost always assume their position is right and won&#039;t bother to give reasons or debate the issue.  That&#039;s why they have routinely run away from debates, especially those on global warming.  Logic is not the basis for their views, emotion is.  And deep down, they know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, that article IS a commentary, obviously she&#8217;s going to give her position.  If it were supposed to be a neutral news piece, then it would be much more concerning.  As such, lefties almost always assume their position is right and won&#8217;t bother to give reasons or debate the issue.  That&#8217;s why they have routinely run away from debates, especially those on global warming.  Logic is not the basis for their views, emotion is.  And deep down, they know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius T</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47632</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47632</guid>
		<description>&quot;how conservative this guy is.&quot;

To be fair, Warren isn&#039;t super conservative.  He&#039;s moderately so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;how conservative this guy is.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be fair, Warren isn&#8217;t super conservative.  He&#8217;s moderately so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47631</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47631</guid>
		<description>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/18/kolbert.warren/index.html?iref=mpstoryview

is a non-evangelical with concerns about Obama picking Warren.  

One thing I noticed is that the piece is carefully crafted to get the reader to just assume her position is correct and Warren&#039;s is bogus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/18/kolbert.warren/index.html?iref=mpstoryview" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/18/kolbert.warren/index.html?iref=mpstoryview</a></p>
<p>is a non-evangelical with concerns about Obama picking Warren.  </p>
<p>One thing I noticed is that the piece is carefully crafted to get the reader to just assume her position is correct and Warren&#8217;s is bogus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Svoboda</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/more-on-the-rick-warren-controversy/#comment-47629</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Svoboda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=3077#comment-47629</guid>
		<description>It seems everyone is in general agreement here...  This may be a first, but I am happy to be in agreement as well.  I think Paul makes a great point that Obama could of easily chosen a pastor everyone likes, but he didn&#039;t.  I really appreciate Rick Warren and I think, for him, he made the right decision.  I do pray Warren can have at least a small influence on Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems everyone is in general agreement here&#8230;  This may be a first, but I am happy to be in agreement as well.  I think Paul makes a great point that Obama could of easily chosen a pastor everyone likes, but he didn&#8217;t.  I really appreciate Rick Warren and I think, for him, he made the right decision.  I do pray Warren can have at least a small influence on Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

