<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greg Boyd Responds to John Piper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/</link>
	<description>A commentary on theology, politics, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-61607</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-61607</guid>
		<description>Hi Ann,

Answering your question - I have just copied a further section from my notes â€“ but as I sais the study extends to some 70 pages so this site is not seem to be the place to publish it all. 

This brings to mind the two roads spoken of by Jesus one leading to life the other to destruction Matt. 7:13-14 and also that the highway of the Lord is the â€˜highway of holinessâ€™ Isaiah 35:8-9.

It is informative that the broad road that leads to destruction has many traveling on it. Thereâ€™s a certain herd instinct and a corporate identity that holds them together in a solidarity against the will and purposes of God. In nations and cities we see this displayed differently in each particular culture. We have to break with all this while truly being friends of sinners. This solidarity against the Lord is demonic in origin Ephesians 2:1-3 and is the reason for Johnâ€™s instruction that we should not love the world (itâ€™s ways, values etc.) 1 John 2:15-17. These solidarities contribute toward the spiritual climate of a region, territory or nation and are probably associated with the ruling â€˜territorial spiritâ€™, see part 3 of this study.

Those who practice or approve evil behaviour, are under Godâ€™s wrath, which means they are given up by Him to the consequences of their â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™ as they have not truly acknowledged God as God. They put themselves on Satanâ€™s territory and God gives them up to it as he can do no other as they have chosen the ground they occupy Rom. 1:18, 24, 26, 28. The believer must take measures of confession and repentance based on an appeal to Godâ€™s mercy which was demonstrated through the cross (the blood). The word of their testimony Revelation  12:11 is just not words it the words of their testimony the evidence and statement of their life committed to God which they hold to, to the death.   

Our struggle against the â€˜evil powersâ€™ is not just by â€˜warfare prayer and preachingâ€™, but requires resisting evil and being personally sanctified. Being separate from sinners, in the way Jesus was Heb 7:26. Not separate in proximity, Jesus mixed with sinners and was their true friend, not separate in that we have no love or have compassion. But separate in attitude, heart, spirit and from their opinions, attitudes and behaviour.

Note: From this point my notes continue to describe numerous gateways through which the enemy may gain an advantage over us and to teach how to minister to those afflicted by Him. 

The stuff you have already read in my previous post id preceded in my notes with the section below. It explains the basis of Satanâ€™s accusations against believers as the covenants they have (perhaps in ignorance) made with him.

b) Ungodly Covenants Provide Demonic Entry Points 2 Corinthians 6 v 14 - 18:

The Lordâ€™s relationship with us is on the basis of â€˜covenantâ€™ or willing agreement between us and Him. This covenant is entered into by agreement and participation in faith and demonstrated by works of faith. Covenants may be contracted by actions or simply by a few words. Just consider that when you get married (legally joined by covenant) to your spouse your whole legal, social and financial situation is changed by a covenant made with just two words â€˜I willâ€™.

An â€˜ungodly covenantâ€™ takes place when we join in any aspect, in agreement in attitude, mentality, behaviourally, emotionally, socially or verbally, sexually or physically, religiously or spiritually, voluntarily or even involuntary, knowingly or even unknowingly or through heredity; with or in any person, thing, project, event or idea that is ungodly or dishonouring to God as our Father. When we enter into â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™ we place ourselves on the enemies territory. We may personally, or our homes, or businesses, or even possessions may become affected by demons. 

2 Corinthians 6:14-17 is extremely instructive in considering â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™: 
â€œDo not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness? Or what harmony has Christ with Belial, or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever? Or what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God. â€¦ be separate â€¦ and I will be a Father to youâ€ 2 Corinthians 6:14-18.

Her Paul uses six different Greek terms to impress upon us the absolute essential truth that we must be separate from all forms of evil in order to avoid being joined to Belial (Satan). Each term has a different nuance giving the sense of the mental and emotional attitudes or ties. The emotional senses and feelings produced by â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™ with demons are expressed and brought out in these terms. See below:- 

Bound (:14)          - Greek heterozugeo : yoked i.e. joined together unequally.
Partnership (:14)  - Greek metoche: a partner, fellow, partaker sharer.
Fellowship (:14)   - Greek koininia: a having in common, communion, share in experientially .
Harmony (:15)     - Greek sumphoneo: concord, to sound together as in music, to be in accord.
Common (:15)     - Part â€“ to have a part or share in.
Agreement (:16)  - Greek sunkatathesis: to be well minded, well disposed towards, to agree with is similar to â€œGiving hearty approvalâ€ to evil in  Rom. 1:32.

We are warned not to be joined to unbelievers in the sense of - partaking, sharing, having in common, being in concord, having a part with, being well minded towards or agreeing with them in anything that is evil or ungodly. Ignoring this warning is equated to being well disposed towards idols, touching what is â€˜uncleanâ€™ and sharing with demons in 1 Corinthians 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ann,</p>
<p>Answering your question &#8211; I have just copied a further section from my notes â€“ but as I sais the study extends to some 70 pages so this site is not seem to be the place to publish it all. </p>
<p>This brings to mind the two roads spoken of by Jesus one leading to life the other to destruction Matt. 7:13-14 and also that the highway of the Lord is the â€˜highway of holinessâ€™ Isaiah 35:8-9.</p>
<p>It is informative that the broad road that leads to destruction has many traveling on it. Thereâ€™s a certain herd instinct and a corporate identity that holds them together in a solidarity against the will and purposes of God. In nations and cities we see this displayed differently in each particular culture. We have to break with all this while truly being friends of sinners. This solidarity against the Lord is demonic in origin Ephesians 2:1-3 and is the reason for Johnâ€™s instruction that we should not love the world (itâ€™s ways, values etc.) 1 John 2:15-17. These solidarities contribute toward the spiritual climate of a region, territory or nation and are probably associated with the ruling â€˜territorial spiritâ€™, see part 3 of this study.</p>
<p>Those who practice or approve evil behaviour, are under Godâ€™s wrath, which means they are given up by Him to the consequences of their â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™ as they have not truly acknowledged God as God. They put themselves on Satanâ€™s territory and God gives them up to it as he can do no other as they have chosen the ground they occupy Rom. 1:18, 24, 26, 28. The believer must take measures of confession and repentance based on an appeal to Godâ€™s mercy which was demonstrated through the cross (the blood). The word of their testimony Revelation  12:11 is just not words it the words of their testimony the evidence and statement of their life committed to God which they hold to, to the death.   </p>
<p>Our struggle against the â€˜evil powersâ€™ is not just by â€˜warfare prayer and preachingâ€™, but requires resisting evil and being personally sanctified. Being separate from sinners, in the way Jesus was Heb 7:26. Not separate in proximity, Jesus mixed with sinners and was their true friend, not separate in that we have no love or have compassion. But separate in attitude, heart, spirit and from their opinions, attitudes and behaviour.</p>
<p>Note: From this point my notes continue to describe numerous gateways through which the enemy may gain an advantage over us and to teach how to minister to those afflicted by Him. </p>
<p>The stuff you have already read in my previous post id preceded in my notes with the section below. It explains the basis of Satanâ€™s accusations against believers as the covenants they have (perhaps in ignorance) made with him.</p>
<p>b) Ungodly Covenants Provide Demonic Entry Points 2 Corinthians 6 v 14 &#8211; 18:</p>
<p>The Lordâ€™s relationship with us is on the basis of â€˜covenantâ€™ or willing agreement between us and Him. This covenant is entered into by agreement and participation in faith and demonstrated by works of faith. Covenants may be contracted by actions or simply by a few words. Just consider that when you get married (legally joined by covenant) to your spouse your whole legal, social and financial situation is changed by a covenant made with just two words â€˜I willâ€™.</p>
<p>An â€˜ungodly covenantâ€™ takes place when we join in any aspect, in agreement in attitude, mentality, behaviourally, emotionally, socially or verbally, sexually or physically, religiously or spiritually, voluntarily or even involuntary, knowingly or even unknowingly or through heredity; with or in any person, thing, project, event or idea that is ungodly or dishonouring to God as our Father. When we enter into â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™ we place ourselves on the enemies territory. We may personally, or our homes, or businesses, or even possessions may become affected by demons. </p>
<p>2 Corinthians 6:14-17 is extremely instructive in considering â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™:<br />
â€œDo not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness? Or what harmony has Christ with Belial, or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever? Or what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God. â€¦ be separate â€¦ and I will be a Father to youâ€ 2 Corinthians 6:14-18.</p>
<p>Her Paul uses six different Greek terms to impress upon us the absolute essential truth that we must be separate from all forms of evil in order to avoid being joined to Belial (Satan). Each term has a different nuance giving the sense of the mental and emotional attitudes or ties. The emotional senses and feelings produced by â€˜ungodly covenantsâ€™ with demons are expressed and brought out in these terms. See below:- </p>
<p>Bound (:14)          &#8211; Greek heterozugeo : yoked i.e. joined together unequally.<br />
Partnership (:14)  &#8211; Greek metoche: a partner, fellow, partaker sharer.<br />
Fellowship (:14)   &#8211; Greek koininia: a having in common, communion, share in experientially .<br />
Harmony (:15)     &#8211; Greek sumphoneo: concord, to sound together as in music, to be in accord.<br />
Common (:15)     &#8211; Part â€“ to have a part or share in.<br />
Agreement (:16)  &#8211; Greek sunkatathesis: to be well minded, well disposed towards, to agree with is similar to â€œGiving hearty approvalâ€ to evil in  Rom. 1:32.</p>
<p>We are warned not to be joined to unbelievers in the sense of &#8211; partaking, sharing, having in common, being in concord, having a part with, being well minded towards or agreeing with them in anything that is evil or ungodly. Ignoring this warning is equated to being well disposed towards idols, touching what is â€˜uncleanâ€™ and sharing with demons in 1 Corinthians 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-61579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-61579</guid>
		<description>Rob - is there more to your discussion? The last sentence says &quot;This brings to mind the two roads spoken of by Jesus in Matt. 7:13-14.

Was that the end? I am interested in the rest if there is more. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; is there more to your discussion? The last sentence says &#8220;This brings to mind the two roads spoken of by Jesus in Matt. 7:13-14.</p>
<p>Was that the end? I am interested in the rest if there is more. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-57521</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 03:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-57521</guid>
		<description>I have heard Greg Boyd commenting about God allowing Satan to deal with Job as he did. Boyd suggested that the genre of the book of Job is that of an epic poem and that how far we should push a literal interpretation of God â€˜allowingâ€™ Satanâ€™s attack on Job is questionable. 
 
I tend to agree that the concept of God â€˜allowingâ€™ evil needs a lot more unpacking. It is not a simple issue. If I were to allow evil that I had the power and moral right to prevent and I refused to do so,  I think you would  consider that I was implicated in the evil itself. God never gives the explanation to Job that he allowed what took place. He just gave examples of things that were beyond Jobâ€™s experience, knowledge or understanding. If we are unlike the apostle Paul and are indeed ignorant of Satanâ€™s devices I think it best to leave it at that. However if we wish to search the scriptures we may learn a little more.

Otherâ€™s have tried to find a reason for why all this was able (rather than allowed by God) to happened to Job and have suggested that there was some gap as it were in Jobâ€™s spiritual defences against Satan.  Again to a degree this is speculation as we are not specifically told this was the case in Jobâ€™s particular situation. However we are in a better place than Job in attempting to understand what was going on. The Biblical revelation is progressive and this is particularly so in relation to Satan, the devil and demons. They get very little mention in the Old Testament but come out of the woodwork when Jesus appears on the earth enforcing the Kingdom of God and confronting the â€˜prince of this worldâ€™ on the territory he lays claim to. 
So we can consider the suggestion that the reason for Jobâ€™s calamity was partly due to his own spiritual  state in the light of the rest of scripture and our fuller New Testament revelation. It has been suggested that Jobâ€™s fear was a breach in his defences. I will make an attempt to construct a case that this may have been so by reference to scripture as follows:-
1) Eph. 6:11-12 requires us to take action in our defense and aggression against the Devil â€“ so our security or vulnerability to his attacks are not entirely up to the Lord irrespective of the believers thoughts, attitudes, faith / doubt / unbelief or actions. This putting on of the â€˜armour of Godâ€™ is not some magic formula or prayer ritual as some practice. It is a whole of life issue. The whole context of Ephesians should be considered in relation to interpreting these verses. 
2) Job 1:8 God declares Job 1) Blameless 2) Upright 3) A man who fears God 4) A man who shuns evil. However none of this is equivalent to saying Job was either sinless or did not have some spiritual weaknesses. We can demonstrate this particularly in relation to Job by reference to a few texts:-
2a) Romans 4:5-8  enlightens us on this. Sin may exist but not be imputed or reckoned to an individual while  righteousness is reckoned to that individual on the basis of their faith or trust in the Lord. Righteousness was imputed to Job but he was not sinless or without spiritual weakness or blind spots. Jesus in debate with the Pharisees seems to teach that sin is not imputed to a person who is  ignorant of their sin. John 9:41 â€œJesus said to them, If you were blind, you would have no sin: but now you say, We see; therefore your sin remains.â€
2b) Job 3:25 A particular problem of Job is stated for us â€œFor the thing I greatly feared has come upon me, and what I dreaded has happened to me.â€ Now being in fear is not a position of faith it may be considered the exact opposite. 
2c) Rom 14:23 â€œBut he who doubts is condemned (if he eats,) because (his eating is not from faith; and) whatever is not from faith is sin.â€ We can appreciate the full implications of this text in relation to Job by reading it without the words I have placed in brackets and this is justified by Paulâ€™s use of the word â€˜whatsoeverâ€™. It is clear that Job was not occupying a position of faith in relation to his wealth, Godâ€™s blessing or protection of him and his family.
So you may agree we have identified a sin problem for Job albeit one not imputed. Job seems to have particularly feared that he might suffer such calamity and loss due to one of his childrenâ€™s sin. There is greater awareness of corporate responsibility for sin in the scriptures than today.
2d) â€œhe who doubts is condemnedâ€. We would do well to ask two questions in relation to Job a) Did he doubt, it seems clear he doubted Godâ€™s continual protection and blessing even though from Godâ€™s point of view he was reckoned righteous. b) Who was it that condemned Job and who is it that condemns us if or when we doubt? It is clear God did not condemn Job and in the believers case â€œThere is no condemnation for those who are in Christâ€ Rom. 8:1. The scripture mentions the believers own heart may condemn him but assures us God is greater than our hearts 1 Jn. 3:20. In Jobâ€™s case it was Satan that condemned him or accused him to God. This is in line with Satanâ€™s character as â€˜the accuser of the brethrenâ€™ Rev. 3:20 and the meaning of â€˜Satanâ€™ being adversary. 

â€œAnd I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.â€ Rev 12:10 A virtual description of what was going on around Job.

Notice how Jobâ€™s three friends joined in with Satanâ€™s accusation of Job â€“ this is a practice we must as believers avoid like a plague.

3) Now with New Testament revelation of the working and activity of Satan we may go further. Lets us examine Eph 6:11 â€œPut on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil.â€ and 2 Cor. 2:10-11 â€œBut one whom you forgive anything, I forgive also â€¦ so that no advantage would be taken of us by Satan, for we are not ignorant of his schemes.â€ Paulâ€™s equipment or more accurately spiritual gifting in this area included â€œThe distinguishing of spiritsâ€ 1 Cor. 12:10. 

That Satan had a scheme against Job is evident from the account and also that Job was totally ignorant of the scheme. Nowhere does Job attribute his calamity to Satan but seeks to debate the issue with God. But in the NT we see that Satan devises schemes however the believer can defend himself against these and take measures to prevent him gaining an advantage over him. Paul and those with him declare that unlike Job they were not ignorant of Satanâ€™s schemes and in their case the issue turned on forgiveness. Notice Paulâ€™s instruction says nothing about God allowing these schemes to come upon a believer but instructs the believer on the stance he must take against Satan. Paul warns â€œdo not give the devil an opportunityâ€ Ephesians 4:27 It seems possible to me that Job did provided such an opportunity through his fear.

4) Let us investigate a little further in Light of the New Testament. In Luke 13:16 we read of a woman whom Satan had kept bound for 18 years but more particularly Jesus teaches us in Luke 13:11 it was actually a particular type of spirit or demon â€˜a spirit of infirmityâ€™ that was binding her. We are also told â€œGod has not given us a spirit of fear â€¦â€ 2 Tim 1:7 (Jobâ€™s particular problem). So the direct cause of Jobâ€™s trouble may not have been Satan either but merely one of his emissaries.

The activity of Satan and his demons is very real and Paulâ€™s teaching is much more detailed and enlightening than the little we learn in Job, it is also more practical, active and Kingdom of God centred than speculating philosophically on what God allows (although we must consider such issues also in a comprehensive theology). With regard to this I would suggest you read  â€˜Satan &amp; The Problem of Evil - Constructing a Trinitarian Warfare Theodicyâ€™ and â€˜God at War - The Bible and Spiritual Conflictâ€™ both by Gregory A. Boyd


My wife and I have encountered these direct attacks of demons on the mission field. One instance involved was a highly qualified Christian doctor the personal physician to an African head of state. A demon appeared visibly in the bedroom of this man and His wife each night. This spirit took the form of a former partner of the doctorâ€™s wife. They stayed with us for a weekend while we researched and discerned the cause of this and the ground in their lives that the demon laid claim to. 

This is frequently what is going on in the spiritual realm. The enemy is accusing believers (Job) to God and there is often (perhaps always) some grounds for this accusation â€“ otherwise Satan would not be so dumb as to make the accusation to God about them in the first place. So the task is to determine what is the ground that has been given to the enemy that he is using for his accusation. Bring the counselee to repentance over the issue, then to a place of faith in their standing before the Lord and finally to a place of authority in commanding in the name of Jesus that whatever interference is going on to stop. We did this over the weekend with the doctor and his wife and all appearances of the demon ceased.

On another occasion at a young mans baptism his mother, brother and sister were converted. They all had the same deformity  crippled legs, bent and misshapen. After I led them to the Lord I thought to myself if the Lord was here He would not just forgive them but also heal them. My next thought was â€œI havenâ€™t even got the courage to pray for that.â€ The next thought was â€œyou could at least ask them what the problem isâ€. At the time I believed this was just my thoughts but subsequent to what took place I now believe this was the Holy Spirit directing me. Any way I said â€œWhatâ€™s the problem with all your legs its obviously hereditary as you all have the same problemâ€. The mother replied â€œNo we have been for genetic counselling and examination and they told us it not genetic just a coincidence.â€ As soon as I herd this I thought of the woman with the â€˜spirit of infirmityâ€™ in Luke 13 and was certain just on the basis of logic that the problem in this family was far more likely to be a spirit of infirmity than a coincidence. So I began to pray for the three as I did all the crooked legs began to shake violently and the brother began to see light out of his blind eye. When as soon as I stopped praying they were all left just as they had been and at that time I did not know how to proceed. (I believe I have learnt since that time). Three days later while with the mother was at home with the son we had baptised she felt a jolt in her legs. She had been crippled from birth over 50 years but that day her legs were healed and became perfectly normal. 

We all have a lot to learn about the enemies devises if we like Paul are to dispense of our ignorance and not give the enemy an opportunity on our lives or the lives of those we minister to.

 
I have read dozens of books and made a study of every scripture dealing with Satan and demons which extends to 70 pages and have included a small section below on the subjects of the Devils â€˜Schemesâ€™. Consider it in relation to Job.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
The Schemes of the Devil.

2 Corinthians 6:14 is cross referenced to Ephesians 5:7 &amp; 11, (partakers and fellowship). These verses come in the middle of a section Ephesians 4:17 to 6:12 dealing with a wide range of behaviour that we are warned must not be partakers of or participate in. 

â€œdo not give the devil an opportunityâ€ Ephesians 4:27 â€œPut on the full armour of God, so that you may be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devilâ€ Ephesians 6:11. â€œFor we are not ignorant of his schemesâ€ 2 Corinthians 2:11. (because) our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.â€ Ephesians 6:12,

We learn that demonic powers are behind all the forms of evil behaviour outlined in Ephesians and that they are working to a plan or a scheme to gain advantage over us. This word schemes that is used of the devils plans in Greek is Metaodous. The word has two parts â€˜metaâ€™ means â€˜WITHâ€™ and from this word we get our word â€˜MEETâ€™ and the second part â€˜odousâ€™ from where we get our word â€˜ROADâ€™ . So put together the Devils scheme is the â€˜With Road of the Devilâ€™ or the â€˜Meet Roadâ€™. The road on which we meet with the devilâ€™ What does this mean? There are three things we can learn from this about 

i.	 Satanâ€™s Purpose

In Britain we have a saying â€˜He is leading you down the garden pathâ€™. We mean somebody is leading you astray, conning you, tricking you, cheating you. Leading you in a given direction for the purpose of gaining advantage over you. The devils scheme relates to a purpose and a direction i.e. a â€˜ROADâ€™, he is crowding us into for our destruction.
.
ii.	Satanâ€™s Authority

Simply it is his road it is the â€˜with-roadâ€™ or Scheme of the Devil. He meets up with us on the road of life and attempts to get us onto his ground. On his ground he claims authority and accuses us to God. Unless we take scriptural measures to meet that accusation Godâ€™s justice acknowledged Satanâ€™s claim. Fortunately we do have an â€˜advocateâ€™ with the Father in the face of our accuser. However Jesus advocacy on our behalf only becomes effective if we confess the particular sin/s that is the ground of Satanâ€™s accusation/s. 

â€œThis is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth; but if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin. If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us.â€ 1 John 1:5-10 â€¦ â€œMy little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteousâ€ 1 Jn. 2:1.

iii.	Satanâ€™s Companionship

Again the force of this word scheme implies a joining of ourselves with evil we â€˜MEET WITHâ€™ the devil on his ground, in or for some particular purpose (road), opposed to the purpose of God. When we place ourselves on his ground through sin we are â€˜WITHâ€™ him on his â€˜ROADâ€™. 

This brings to mind the two roads spoken of by Jesus in Matt. 7:13-14.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard Greg Boyd commenting about God allowing Satan to deal with Job as he did. Boyd suggested that the genre of the book of Job is that of an epic poem and that how far we should push a literal interpretation of God â€˜allowingâ€™ Satanâ€™s attack on Job is questionable. </p>
<p>I tend to agree that the concept of God â€˜allowingâ€™ evil needs a lot more unpacking. It is not a simple issue. If I were to allow evil that I had the power and moral right to prevent and I refused to do so,  I think you would  consider that I was implicated in the evil itself. God never gives the explanation to Job that he allowed what took place. He just gave examples of things that were beyond Jobâ€™s experience, knowledge or understanding. If we are unlike the apostle Paul and are indeed ignorant of Satanâ€™s devices I think it best to leave it at that. However if we wish to search the scriptures we may learn a little more.</p>
<p>Otherâ€™s have tried to find a reason for why all this was able (rather than allowed by God) to happened to Job and have suggested that there was some gap as it were in Jobâ€™s spiritual defences against Satan.  Again to a degree this is speculation as we are not specifically told this was the case in Jobâ€™s particular situation. However we are in a better place than Job in attempting to understand what was going on. The Biblical revelation is progressive and this is particularly so in relation to Satan, the devil and demons. They get very little mention in the Old Testament but come out of the woodwork when Jesus appears on the earth enforcing the Kingdom of God and confronting the â€˜prince of this worldâ€™ on the territory he lays claim to.<br />
So we can consider the suggestion that the reason for Jobâ€™s calamity was partly due to his own spiritual  state in the light of the rest of scripture and our fuller New Testament revelation. It has been suggested that Jobâ€™s fear was a breach in his defences. I will make an attempt to construct a case that this may have been so by reference to scripture as follows:-<br />
1) Eph. 6:11-12 requires us to take action in our defense and aggression against the Devil â€“ so our security or vulnerability to his attacks are not entirely up to the Lord irrespective of the believers thoughts, attitudes, faith / doubt / unbelief or actions. This putting on of the â€˜armour of Godâ€™ is not some magic formula or prayer ritual as some practice. It is a whole of life issue. The whole context of Ephesians should be considered in relation to interpreting these verses.<br />
2) Job 1:8 God declares Job 1) Blameless 2) Upright 3) A man who fears God 4) A man who shuns evil. However none of this is equivalent to saying Job was either sinless or did not have some spiritual weaknesses. We can demonstrate this particularly in relation to Job by reference to a few texts:-<br />
2a) Romans 4:5-8  enlightens us on this. Sin may exist but not be imputed or reckoned to an individual while  righteousness is reckoned to that individual on the basis of their faith or trust in the Lord. Righteousness was imputed to Job but he was not sinless or without spiritual weakness or blind spots. Jesus in debate with the Pharisees seems to teach that sin is not imputed to a person who is  ignorant of their sin. John 9:41 â€œJesus said to them, If you were blind, you would have no sin: but now you say, We see; therefore your sin remains.â€<br />
2b) Job 3:25 A particular problem of Job is stated for us â€œFor the thing I greatly feared has come upon me, and what I dreaded has happened to me.â€ Now being in fear is not a position of faith it may be considered the exact opposite.<br />
2c) Rom 14:23 â€œBut he who doubts is condemned (if he eats,) because (his eating is not from faith; and) whatever is not from faith is sin.â€ We can appreciate the full implications of this text in relation to Job by reading it without the words I have placed in brackets and this is justified by Paulâ€™s use of the word â€˜whatsoeverâ€™. It is clear that Job was not occupying a position of faith in relation to his wealth, Godâ€™s blessing or protection of him and his family.<br />
So you may agree we have identified a sin problem for Job albeit one not imputed. Job seems to have particularly feared that he might suffer such calamity and loss due to one of his childrenâ€™s sin. There is greater awareness of corporate responsibility for sin in the scriptures than today.<br />
2d) â€œhe who doubts is condemnedâ€. We would do well to ask two questions in relation to Job a) Did he doubt, it seems clear he doubted Godâ€™s continual protection and blessing even though from Godâ€™s point of view he was reckoned righteous. b) Who was it that condemned Job and who is it that condemns us if or when we doubt? It is clear God did not condemn Job and in the believers case â€œThere is no condemnation for those who are in Christâ€ Rom. 8:1. The scripture mentions the believers own heart may condemn him but assures us God is greater than our hearts 1 Jn. 3:20. In Jobâ€™s case it was Satan that condemned him or accused him to God. This is in line with Satanâ€™s character as â€˜the accuser of the brethrenâ€™ Rev. 3:20 and the meaning of â€˜Satanâ€™ being adversary. </p>
<p>â€œAnd I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.â€ Rev 12:10 A virtual description of what was going on around Job.</p>
<p>Notice how Jobâ€™s three friends joined in with Satanâ€™s accusation of Job â€“ this is a practice we must as believers avoid like a plague.</p>
<p>3) Now with New Testament revelation of the working and activity of Satan we may go further. Lets us examine Eph 6:11 â€œPut on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil.â€ and 2 Cor. 2:10-11 â€œBut one whom you forgive anything, I forgive also â€¦ so that no advantage would be taken of us by Satan, for we are not ignorant of his schemes.â€ Paulâ€™s equipment or more accurately spiritual gifting in this area included â€œThe distinguishing of spiritsâ€ 1 Cor. 12:10. </p>
<p>That Satan had a scheme against Job is evident from the account and also that Job was totally ignorant of the scheme. Nowhere does Job attribute his calamity to Satan but seeks to debate the issue with God. But in the NT we see that Satan devises schemes however the believer can defend himself against these and take measures to prevent him gaining an advantage over him. Paul and those with him declare that unlike Job they were not ignorant of Satanâ€™s schemes and in their case the issue turned on forgiveness. Notice Paulâ€™s instruction says nothing about God allowing these schemes to come upon a believer but instructs the believer on the stance he must take against Satan. Paul warns â€œdo not give the devil an opportunityâ€ Ephesians 4:27 It seems possible to me that Job did provided such an opportunity through his fear.</p>
<p>4) Let us investigate a little further in Light of the New Testament. In Luke 13:16 we read of a woman whom Satan had kept bound for 18 years but more particularly Jesus teaches us in Luke 13:11 it was actually a particular type of spirit or demon â€˜a spirit of infirmityâ€™ that was binding her. We are also told â€œGod has not given us a spirit of fear â€¦â€ 2 Tim 1:7 (Jobâ€™s particular problem). So the direct cause of Jobâ€™s trouble may not have been Satan either but merely one of his emissaries.</p>
<p>The activity of Satan and his demons is very real and Paulâ€™s teaching is much more detailed and enlightening than the little we learn in Job, it is also more practical, active and Kingdom of God centred than speculating philosophically on what God allows (although we must consider such issues also in a comprehensive theology). With regard to this I would suggest you read  â€˜Satan &amp; The Problem of Evil &#8211; Constructing a Trinitarian Warfare Theodicyâ€™ and â€˜God at War &#8211; The Bible and Spiritual Conflictâ€™ both by Gregory A. Boyd</p>
<p>My wife and I have encountered these direct attacks of demons on the mission field. One instance involved was a highly qualified Christian doctor the personal physician to an African head of state. A demon appeared visibly in the bedroom of this man and His wife each night. This spirit took the form of a former partner of the doctorâ€™s wife. They stayed with us for a weekend while we researched and discerned the cause of this and the ground in their lives that the demon laid claim to. </p>
<p>This is frequently what is going on in the spiritual realm. The enemy is accusing believers (Job) to God and there is often (perhaps always) some grounds for this accusation â€“ otherwise Satan would not be so dumb as to make the accusation to God about them in the first place. So the task is to determine what is the ground that has been given to the enemy that he is using for his accusation. Bring the counselee to repentance over the issue, then to a place of faith in their standing before the Lord and finally to a place of authority in commanding in the name of Jesus that whatever interference is going on to stop. We did this over the weekend with the doctor and his wife and all appearances of the demon ceased.</p>
<p>On another occasion at a young mans baptism his mother, brother and sister were converted. They all had the same deformity  crippled legs, bent and misshapen. After I led them to the Lord I thought to myself if the Lord was here He would not just forgive them but also heal them. My next thought was â€œI havenâ€™t even got the courage to pray for that.â€ The next thought was â€œyou could at least ask them what the problem isâ€. At the time I believed this was just my thoughts but subsequent to what took place I now believe this was the Holy Spirit directing me. Any way I said â€œWhatâ€™s the problem with all your legs its obviously hereditary as you all have the same problemâ€. The mother replied â€œNo we have been for genetic counselling and examination and they told us it not genetic just a coincidence.â€ As soon as I herd this I thought of the woman with the â€˜spirit of infirmityâ€™ in Luke 13 and was certain just on the basis of logic that the problem in this family was far more likely to be a spirit of infirmity than a coincidence. So I began to pray for the three as I did all the crooked legs began to shake violently and the brother began to see light out of his blind eye. When as soon as I stopped praying they were all left just as they had been and at that time I did not know how to proceed. (I believe I have learnt since that time). Three days later while with the mother was at home with the son we had baptised she felt a jolt in her legs. She had been crippled from birth over 50 years but that day her legs were healed and became perfectly normal. </p>
<p>We all have a lot to learn about the enemies devises if we like Paul are to dispense of our ignorance and not give the enemy an opportunity on our lives or the lives of those we minister to.</p>
<p>I have read dozens of books and made a study of every scripture dealing with Satan and demons which extends to 70 pages and have included a small section below on the subjects of the Devils â€˜Schemesâ€™. Consider it in relation to Job.<br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
The Schemes of the Devil.</p>
<p>2 Corinthians 6:14 is cross referenced to Ephesians 5:7 &amp; 11, (partakers and fellowship). These verses come in the middle of a section Ephesians 4:17 to 6:12 dealing with a wide range of behaviour that we are warned must not be partakers of or participate in. </p>
<p>â€œdo not give the devil an opportunityâ€ Ephesians 4:27 â€œPut on the full armour of God, so that you may be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devilâ€ Ephesians 6:11. â€œFor we are not ignorant of his schemesâ€ 2 Corinthians 2:11. (because) our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.â€ Ephesians 6:12,</p>
<p>We learn that demonic powers are behind all the forms of evil behaviour outlined in Ephesians and that they are working to a plan or a scheme to gain advantage over us. This word schemes that is used of the devils plans in Greek is Metaodous. The word has two parts â€˜metaâ€™ means â€˜WITHâ€™ and from this word we get our word â€˜MEETâ€™ and the second part â€˜odousâ€™ from where we get our word â€˜ROADâ€™ . So put together the Devils scheme is the â€˜With Road of the Devilâ€™ or the â€˜Meet Roadâ€™. The road on which we meet with the devilâ€™ What does this mean? There are three things we can learn from this about </p>
<p>i.	 Satanâ€™s Purpose</p>
<p>In Britain we have a saying â€˜He is leading you down the garden pathâ€™. We mean somebody is leading you astray, conning you, tricking you, cheating you. Leading you in a given direction for the purpose of gaining advantage over you. The devils scheme relates to a purpose and a direction i.e. a â€˜ROADâ€™, he is crowding us into for our destruction.<br />
.<br />
ii.	Satanâ€™s Authority</p>
<p>Simply it is his road it is the â€˜with-roadâ€™ or Scheme of the Devil. He meets up with us on the road of life and attempts to get us onto his ground. On his ground he claims authority and accuses us to God. Unless we take scriptural measures to meet that accusation Godâ€™s justice acknowledged Satanâ€™s claim. Fortunately we do have an â€˜advocateâ€™ with the Father in the face of our accuser. However Jesus advocacy on our behalf only becomes effective if we confess the particular sin/s that is the ground of Satanâ€™s accusation/s. </p>
<p>â€œThis is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth; but if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin. If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us.â€ 1 John 1:5-10 â€¦ â€œMy little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteousâ€ 1 Jn. 2:1.</p>
<p>iii.	Satanâ€™s Companionship</p>
<p>Again the force of this word scheme implies a joining of ourselves with evil we â€˜MEET WITHâ€™ the devil on his ground, in or for some particular purpose (road), opposed to the purpose of God. When we place ourselves on his ground through sin we are â€˜WITHâ€™ him on his â€˜ROADâ€™. </p>
<p>This brings to mind the two roads spoken of by Jesus in Matt. 7:13-14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-57503</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 05:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-57503</guid>
		<description>God permits evil and He uses it to fulfill His purposes.God in His sovereignty permitted the devil to do things to Job.God was not the cause of the evil that happened to Job.God didn&#039;t do any of the evil to Job.He didn&#039;t cause the Sabeans to come and He didn&#039;t kill Job&#039;s children.He didn&#039;t give Job the sores.Job was wrong in attributing the evil to God.God allowed the enemy to do his work.It was the devil that wreaked havoc in Job&#039;s life not God.So in the sense that God took away was in allowing the enemy to have free reign in his life.God in His sovereign lordship allowed the devil to take away so we are always wrong to attribute murder and sickness and evil to God.I believe with all my heart that it is a great travesty and a bad witness to the lost to attribute to God the terrible evil that is in our world.God is at work in the world by His Holy Spirit and the preaching of the gospel to save people and the responsibility of the church is to preach the gospel and be a witness to Christ in light of the day of judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God permits evil and He uses it to fulfill His purposes.God in His sovereignty permitted the devil to do things to Job.God was not the cause of the evil that happened to Job.God didn&#8217;t do any of the evil to Job.He didn&#8217;t cause the Sabeans to come and He didn&#8217;t kill Job&#8217;s children.He didn&#8217;t give Job the sores.Job was wrong in attributing the evil to God.God allowed the enemy to do his work.It was the devil that wreaked havoc in Job&#8217;s life not God.So in the sense that God took away was in allowing the enemy to have free reign in his life.God in His sovereign lordship allowed the devil to take away so we are always wrong to attribute murder and sickness and evil to God.I believe with all my heart that it is a great travesty and a bad witness to the lost to attribute to God the terrible evil that is in our world.God is at work in the world by His Holy Spirit and the preaching of the gospel to save people and the responsibility of the church is to preach the gospel and be a witness to Christ in light of the day of judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-57165</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-57165</guid>
		<description>The scripture states Job did nor sin in anything he said - it does not say he was not mistaken - or that his statement &#039;the Lord gives and the Lord takes away&#039; is correct or true. We are introduce to the devil in the prologue, back stage as it were - but Job never mentions him and is unaware of his role. In the end the Lord confronts Job and the basic message to Job is that the situation is much more complicated and there&#039;s more going on cosmically than Job can fathom. Job wants to debate his case with the Lord. He maintains He is righteous, which his friends deny. They say if you were you would be blessed and not go through this stuff (hey the prosperity gospel is not new after all). God tells them clearly they have got it wrong and that Job is righteous. The problem is Job believed the same gospel as his friends and also that he was righteous. 
So his only explanation to himself was that he thought something had gone amiss - some error had taken place in heavens justic and he wanted to debate it with the Lord. However he wonderfully maintaied &#039;if He slays me yet I will praise Him&#039;. So even while thinking that the Lord was directly reponsible for his misfortune he did not sin with his lips, even though mistaken over the miscarriage of heavens justice. 
Actually what was going on at a cosmic level was that God was prooved right and just before the heavenly court (Angels) and in the face of Satan&#039;s taugnt that God basically bribed Job with blessing to obtain his praise. Job&#039;s faithfullness to God prooved God just. See Roger Forster &#039;Gods Straqtegy in Human History&#039;.
By the way Greg Boyd is definitly not a universalist and the points he was making leading to this suspicion have been entirly misunderst in previous posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scripture states Job did nor sin in anything he said &#8211; it does not say he was not mistaken &#8211; or that his statement &#8216;the Lord gives and the Lord takes away&#8217; is correct or true. We are introduce to the devil in the prologue, back stage as it were &#8211; but Job never mentions him and is unaware of his role. In the end the Lord confronts Job and the basic message to Job is that the situation is much more complicated and there&#8217;s more going on cosmically than Job can fathom. Job wants to debate his case with the Lord. He maintains He is righteous, which his friends deny. They say if you were you would be blessed and not go through this stuff (hey the prosperity gospel is not new after all). God tells them clearly they have got it wrong and that Job is righteous. The problem is Job believed the same gospel as his friends and also that he was righteous.<br />
So his only explanation to himself was that he thought something had gone amiss &#8211; some error had taken place in heavens justic and he wanted to debate it with the Lord. However he wonderfully maintaied &#8216;if He slays me yet I will praise Him&#8217;. So even while thinking that the Lord was directly reponsible for his misfortune he did not sin with his lips, even though mistaken over the miscarriage of heavens justice.<br />
Actually what was going on at a cosmic level was that God was prooved right and just before the heavenly court (Angels) and in the face of Satan&#8217;s taugnt that God basically bribed Job with blessing to obtain his praise. Job&#8217;s faithfullness to God prooved God just. See Roger Forster &#8216;Gods Straqtegy in Human History&#8217;.<br />
By the way Greg Boyd is definitly not a universalist and the points he was making leading to this suspicion have been entirly misunderst in previous posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-53018</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-53018</guid>
		<description>The scope of &quot;all things&quot; are confined and relative to things and people &quot;in Christ.&quot; The context of the entire chapter suggests this. This passage is Christocentric fits in and flows with a chapter that is explicitly and obviously about the exaltation, supremacy, and centrally of Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scope of &#8220;all things&#8221; are confined and relative to things and people &#8220;in Christ.&#8221; The context of the entire chapter suggests this. This passage is Christocentric fits in and flows with a chapter that is explicitly and obviously about the exaltation, supremacy, and centrally of Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Cottrell</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-47725</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Cottrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-47725</guid>
		<description>Atta Boy (i.e. right on) - Atta Boi

As has been stated Job is an epic poem and we should not read too much into the Lord needing to give permission to satan to deal with Job. Job was righteous before the Lord and considered so by the Lord Himself. But that does not mean Job was perfect or sinless. It has been suggested that  there was a flaw in Job&#039;s relationship with the Lord that allowed satan access to him. Consider a few facts scripture gives us: a) God had put a hedge arround Job which protected him from Satan b)Jesus said satan was comming against Him but had &#039;nothing in Him. c)This was not completly true of Job as he said &quot;the thing i have feared has come upon me. While scripture links the fearfull with the unbeliving and tells us that those who fear are not perfected in love. Therefore it is suggested that there was a gap in Job&#039;s spiritual defences that allowed satan access to aflict him.
The leasson of the book of Job seems to be to teach us that things are more involved and than our theology might consider. There was a lot of stuff happening behind the sceans on the part of the Lord and satan and much that might baffle Job. He new he was basically righteous before the Lord but wrongly assumed this should guarantee his well being on earth (bit of a prosperity gospel). He resisted his friends condemnation and was sure of the final outcome in the ressurection. That Job had not sinned with his words does not mean that he was not mistaken at times. It means that in the midst of his mystery why all this was happening to him, he did not blame the Lord or curse him as his wife encouraged. He tried ti reason and argue it out with God as a man to a man. When he was confronted by the Lord he realised that things were more complex than he had immagined. He was caught up in a cosmic spiritual war and had actually become as it part of the battle ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atta Boy (i.e. right on) &#8211; Atta Boi</p>
<p>As has been stated Job is an epic poem and we should not read too much into the Lord needing to give permission to satan to deal with Job. Job was righteous before the Lord and considered so by the Lord Himself. But that does not mean Job was perfect or sinless. It has been suggested that  there was a flaw in Job&#8217;s relationship with the Lord that allowed satan access to him. Consider a few facts scripture gives us: a) God had put a hedge arround Job which protected him from Satan b)Jesus said satan was comming against Him but had &#8216;nothing in Him. c)This was not completly true of Job as he said &#8220;the thing i have feared has come upon me. While scripture links the fearfull with the unbeliving and tells us that those who fear are not perfected in love. Therefore it is suggested that there was a gap in Job&#8217;s spiritual defences that allowed satan access to aflict him.<br />
The leasson of the book of Job seems to be to teach us that things are more involved and than our theology might consider. There was a lot of stuff happening behind the sceans on the part of the Lord and satan and much that might baffle Job. He new he was basically righteous before the Lord but wrongly assumed this should guarantee his well being on earth (bit of a prosperity gospel). He resisted his friends condemnation and was sure of the final outcome in the ressurection. That Job had not sinned with his words does not mean that he was not mistaken at times. It means that in the midst of his mystery why all this was happening to him, he did not blame the Lord or curse him as his wife encouraged. He tried ti reason and argue it out with God as a man to a man. When he was confronted by the Lord he realised that things were more complex than he had immagined. He was caught up in a cosmic spiritual war and had actually become as it part of the battle ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atta Boi</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-31600</link>
		<dc:creator>Atta Boi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-31600</guid>
		<description>I do not get from the book of Job that God controls every move that Satan makes.  Was God controlling Satan at the fall?

The book of Job begins by saying that Satan and his angels presented themselves before the Lord.  I would guess that the rest of the time when they are not presenting themselves before the Lord that Satan goes behind Gods back to do evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not get from the book of Job that God controls every move that Satan makes.  Was God controlling Satan at the fall?</p>
<p>The book of Job begins by saying that Satan and his angels presented themselves before the Lord.  I would guess that the rest of the time when they are not presenting themselves before the Lord that Satan goes behind Gods back to do evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-29556</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-29556</guid>
		<description>hola, i&#039;m new to this site. i side with boyd on this issue. i don&#039;t think he is trying to abolish mystery, as some would say, but that he is embracing it moreso than others (piper). boyd appeals to the dominance of angelic and demonic forces on this earth, which are clearly abiding with or going against the will of God. Satan is not &quot;controlled&quot; by God. that notion is just ridiculous. the earth is not a stage that was set with a pre-written script. the earth is a place the God created as an extension of God&#039;s great Love. Satan is a free agent that chose to go against God, just as all of humanity has ultimately chosen. 

the bridge collapse is not part of God&#039;s will and that is all that Boyd is saying. Compatibalism is flawed in so many ways that this is certainly not the place to point out all the reasons. i think we need to keep a more open mind about the entirety of Scripture rather than focusing on Pauline theology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hola, i&#8217;m new to this site. i side with boyd on this issue. i don&#8217;t think he is trying to abolish mystery, as some would say, but that he is embracing it moreso than others (piper). boyd appeals to the dominance of angelic and demonic forces on this earth, which are clearly abiding with or going against the will of God. Satan is not &#8220;controlled&#8221; by God. that notion is just ridiculous. the earth is not a stage that was set with a pre-written script. the earth is a place the God created as an extension of God&#8217;s great Love. Satan is a free agent that chose to go against God, just as all of humanity has ultimately chosen. </p>
<p>the bridge collapse is not part of God&#8217;s will and that is all that Boyd is saying. Compatibalism is flawed in so many ways that this is certainly not the place to point out all the reasons. i think we need to keep a more open mind about the entirety of Scripture rather than focusing on Pauline theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denny Burk</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/greg-boyd-responds-to-john-piper/#comment-14200</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny Burk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 05:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=832#comment-14200</guid>
		<description>Dear Jeremy,

See here: http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=864.

Thanks,
Denny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jeremy,</p>
<p>See here: <a href="http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=864" rel="nofollow">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=864</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

