DeYoung takes on Complemegalitarianism

Kevin DeYoung picks apart John Stott’s chapter on “Women, Men and God” in the book Issues Facing Christians Today. Stott argues for a middle-way between complementarianism and egalitarianism, but DeYoung shows that Stott’s exegesis is not at all compelling. He writes:

“If anyone could present a strong case for women elders and pastors, or something less than full blown complementarianism, surely John Stott could. But in actuality, a close examination of Stott’s exegesis shows just how weak the middle-of-the-road position (not to mention the egalitarian position) really is.”

Part 1 of DeYoung’s critique appears today, and part 2 will appear tomorrow. Read it here.

One Response to DeYoung takes on Complemegalitarianism

  1. Donald Johnson June 23, 2010 at 10:57 am #

    While there are gradations of non-egalism, from extreme patriarchal to very soft non-egal, there are no gradations in egalism. Since I am egal and see the Bible as teaching this, the softer versions of non-egalism are much preferred to the harder. Every church that moves toward egalism even if they do not embrace it all today, I applaud for their courage.

    Being a very soft non-egal in family matters can appear very close to being egal, but this is not the case with the church; either a woman can have a ministry of elder/overseer or not, I do not see a middle ground. So I do not see that there is much space to sit in a middle ground and wonder who’s fooling whom when someone tries to claim they are sitting on it.

Comment here. Please use FIRST and LAST name.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes