<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CT Covers Piper vs. Wright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dennyburk.com/ct-covers-piper-vs-wright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/ct-covers-piper-vs-wright/</link>
	<description>A commentary on theology, politics, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/ct-covers-piper-vs-wright/#comment-50629</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=4611#comment-50629</guid>
		<description>They both can&#039;t be right because they disagree on some important issues. What is up with David Swanson? Piper was entirely cordial and humble in dealing with Wright. 

&quot;David Swanson says Piper and
his supporters have come across as â€œless generous and humble than
Iâ€™d hope. On an emotional level, this makes Wrightâ€™s view more
intriguing. But Iâ€™ve tried not to dismiss the traditional Reformed
view of justification out of hand because of the rhetoric.â€&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They both can&#8217;t be right because they disagree on some important issues. What is up with David Swanson? Piper was entirely cordial and humble in dealing with Wright. </p>
<p>&#8220;David Swanson says Piper and<br />
his supporters have come across as â€œless generous and humble than<br />
Iâ€™d hope. On an emotional level, this makes Wrightâ€™s view more<br />
intriguing. But Iâ€™ve tried not to dismiss the traditional Reformed<br />
view of justification out of hand because of the rhetoric.â€&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius T</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/ct-covers-piper-vs-wright/#comment-50595</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=4611#comment-50595</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re both right, and this whole disagreement is dumb (or at least overblown).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re both right, and this whole disagreement is dumb (or at least overblown).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.dennyburk.com/ct-covers-piper-vs-wright/#comment-50594</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dennyburk.com/?p=4611#comment-50594</guid>
		<description>I think Wright&#039;s thinking on this is more accurate in the sense of being closer to what Paul meant in the 1st century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Wright&#8217;s thinking on this is more accurate in the sense of being closer to what Paul meant in the 1st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

